August 10, 2007 – 1:24 pm Normally, I’m willing to give people a lot of credit when it comes to missing the obvious. When you’re used to picking out minutiae, sometimes the very obviousness of an answer can render it invisible. This happens a lot in traditional political analysis, and so it’s not surprising that we various Charlie Cook and Stu Rothenberg wannabes with our blogs could miss it, too.
That being said, let’s take a look at a few things together. […]
(Injunz can never give straight answers)
Disclaimer: I continue to have no horse in this race. I am merely trying to be fair to all Democrats. I feel no such obligation to Republicans.
So here was where I shot my mouth off on how lobbyists are neither positive nor negative to our polity, and merely are. I want to clarify something, so here’s an expanded post. […]
August 6, 2007 – 10:53 am Full disclosure: I don’t have a horse in the Democratic primaries. This is not a defense of Hillary Clinton because she’s my candidate, but because this is a chestnut of leftism that really irritates me.
So imagine if you will that a whole bunch of the blogofascisti get together to drink Big Red, clap themselves on the back for how important they are and to meet each other IRL. This is the second time that they’ve had their great meetup. […]