Permalink

Iran's Deteriorating Human Rights Condition


By Ali Eteraz
Posted on Wed Dec 20, 2006 at 08:55:22 PM EST
Tags: iran, stoning, lily mazahery, activism, netroots (all tags)

Text of speech by activist and lawyer Lily Mazahery, President of Legal Rights Institute. She wants you to sign the Stop Stoning Forever Petition. Her speech also contains an update to what happened to the seven women for whom we previously launched a blogospheric email-campaign.


 

Good afternoon.  My name is Lily Mazahery, and I am delighted to be here today, among such a distinguished group of panelists, and to have the opportunity to speak to you today about the deteriorating human rights conditions in Iran.   I would like to express my deep gratitude for the gracious organizers of this important event, the Committee of Iranian Mothers for Freedom:

Lately, I have developed a new hobby:  I spend hours before my computer, pouring over page after page of Farsi weblogs.  I have been pleasantly surprised in discovering that just about every intellectual, activist, and women's rights advocate in Iran, including lawyers and journalists, keeps extensive weblogs, filled with useful information, opinions, and social commentary – the kind of information that is woefully absent from official publications in Iran; the kind of information that the Islamic regime has masterfully, at times forcefully, eliminated from public view for almost three decades.  

Within this new-found treasure trove, I have traveled to the depths of human suffering.  I have witnessed the tears of mothers, the loneliness of daughters, and the hopelessness of fathers and brothers.   I have felt the crushing weight of their silence.  And in my mind, I have painted portraits of the authors who have so generously opened their hearts, minds, and computers to the outside world and to those of us who share with them a common heritage, yet enjoy uncommon freedoms.

I must admit that I have been quite surprised by their candor and bravery.  I have read detailed accounts of torture, executions, beatings, and prisoner abuse.   I have become all too familiar with the pain of the families whose daughters are sentenced to death for acts they never committed, or acts that are the natural right of every human to commit. 

I have learned that by replacing a once progressive legal system with Shari'a doctrine, the Islamic regime has systematically oppressed, marginalized, and dehumanized one half of its own citizens.   Under this draconian and nonsensical system, Iranian women have lost their inheritance rights, as well as custodial rights to their own children.  They are required to secure the express approval of their husbands or male guardians to obtain passports and to travel. Under Shari'a law, a woman's testimony in court is, at best, worth half the testimony of her male counterpart. 

Even more astonishing, Iran's new Islamic-guided government has established a system of legalized prostitution, through the practice of "sigheh" or  "temporary marriages," by which a Mullah arranges a "legal union" between a man and a girl (some as young as 9 years old) for a fee.  The so called "marriage" can last anywhere from one hour to 99 years.   Under this system, the men are free to enter into as many temporary marriages as they so desire, without having ANY legal obligation or responsibility towards the women and children that they "marry" only to use as sexual objects and slaves. 

Not surprisingly, this legalized system of slavery and oppression has led to a growing sex-trafficking industry that is partially operated by government officials and Mullahs themselves.  The girls who are forced into this system of sexual and economic slavery are typically transported to various countries in the Persian Gulf, such as the United Arab Emirates, and are sold to individuals as well as to established brothels.  The budding industry of sexual trafficking of Iranian girls has led to growing concerns about the spread of AIDS/HIV and other sexually-transmitted diseases.

Temporary marriages are not the only method of institutionalized oppression of women and girls by the Islamic regime.  Some of you may be familiar with the case of Atefeh Rajabi, a girl-child hanged to death in the city of Neka in the early hours of August 15 of 2004.   Her crime was officially declared to be "adultery," even though she had never married and was only 16 when the very judge who had condemned her to death served the added role of executioner by personally placing the noose around Atefeh's tiny neck and ordering her body to be lifted.  Unofficially, however, Atefeh's crime was defiance – defiance of the un-natural and unreasonable rules that were forced upon her by the Islamic government; defiance of her status as something less than human; defiance of the inequality, poverty, and misogyny that has infested Iran in the past 27 years; and defiance of the binds designed to break the human spirit and destroy the essence of childhood.    To the very end, Atefeh maintained her defiance.  Witnesses speak of an unusual sense of calmness in her beautiful blue eyes to the last minute.  They recount the girl-child's insolent last words, which were:   "At the very least, you could have given me a glass of water.  Animals are slaughtered more humanely than this." 

Atefeh is not the only girl to be sentenced to death by the Islamic regime, nor the only child.  Despite being a signatory to international treaties that expressly prohibit the heinous practice of child execution, Iran had the dubious honor of being the only country to execute children in 2005.   In 2006, it shares this odious status with Pakistan – the only other country to have executed a child so far this year.

According to data produced by Amnesty International, the Islamic Republic executed at least 8 child offenders in 2005. It carried out its first child execution of 2006 on 13 th of May with the hanging of an unnamed 17-year-old boy. He was executed along with an unnamed 20-year-old man, in Khorramabad.  The two were hanged because they had allegedly engaged in homosexual acts.   

Iran shows little sign of curbing its use of the death penalty on child offenders, just as it shows little respect for the rights of children and women as a whole.  Some of you may know of the case of the 19 year old Delara Darabi , another teenage girl on death row, who has spent the past 2.5 years in prison for a crime she never committed.  After murdering a woman related to Delara, Delara's 19 year old boyfriend, Amir Hossein, convinced Delara to admit responsibility for the murder to protect him from execution.   Apparently, both teenagers believed that because Delara was under the age of 18, she could not be sentenced to death.  This belief proved to be devastatingly false. 

With complete disregard for its obligations under the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC),  and despite overwhelming evidence of Delara's innocence, a court in the city of Rasht found the teenager guilty of murder based on her initial claim of responsibility and sentenced her to death by hanging.   The Islamic regime displayed even greater disregard for its promises to the international community, as well as to the rights of its own children when its highest court upheld Delara's death sentence.

In prison, Delara has proven to be a remarkably poised and strong young girl with an amazing talent for painting and drawing.  She has used her gift to compile a diary of her pain as a child prisoner on death row.   She has produced an impressive collection of paintings that speak of the horrors of torture, of beatings, of hopelessness, loneliness, and the loss of a child's innocence.  They are haunting images of injustice and brutality.  They are the stories of the innocent women and children of Iran, shackled by the injustices of a brutal regime.  They are a teenager's diary of crimes against humanity committed by her government.    

Recently, we have witnessed a few rays of hope amongst the darkness that has befallen the citizens of Iran.  By using the internet to communicate with human rights lawyers, activists, and journalists inside Iran, we have been able to organize an international network of lawyers and journalists who have selflessly and bravely dedicated their lives, personal resources, and boundless energy to saving the lives of innocent Iranians.   Through protests, demonstrations, publication of reports of atrocities committed by the Iranian regime and internet-based petitions in various languages, we have generated substantial international attention towards the unjust imprisonment of women and girls who have been sentenced to death, particularly those who have been condemned to death by stoning.  

The result of this international collaboration has been nothing less than astonishing!  In the past few months, we have been successful in securing stays of executions for Malak Ghorbany, Ashraf Kalhori, Kobra Rahmanpour and other innocent women.  After spending 7 years in prison for a crime that she had never committed, Hajieh Esmailvand was finally released from jail last week after all charges of "adultery" were dismissed in her case.  Parisa Akbari, a woman who was forced into prostitution by her husband, was also released from prison after the charges of "adultery," for which she had been sentenced to death by stoning were also dismissed.   We are hopeful that our efforts will be successful in obtaining similar results for other prisoners, whose only "crime" is to have been born female in a society that not only devalues their existence, but takes extreme measures to take away their most basic rights as humans.   In this context, we have initiated the One Million Signature campaign, designed to change laws that specifically discriminate against women and girls.  We have also organized the Stop Stoning Forever campaign and signature drive, calling for the permanent removal of stoning laws from the Iranian legal system.  By joining forces, by speaking out about the atrocities of the Islamic regime, as well as the efforts to curtail those brutalities, WE CAN MAKE A DIFFFERENCE.   We owe that to the daughters of Cyrus the Great.

The silent screams of women and girls existing under horrors of the Islamic regime must be acknowledged by each and every one of us.  We MUST express our outrage, voice our anger, and show our support to those who can not speak for themselves.  Anything less would be less than human, less than American, and most certainly, less than Persian.

< Soul of the Dhol | Eteraz Experts | Need Your Help >

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:

Tags: iran, stoning, lily mazahery, activism, netroots (all tags) :: Add Tags to this Story
Display: Sort:

brilliant(none / 0) (#1)
by sarah on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 01:06:14 AM EST

Powerful and Brilliant.

We need more advocates like this in the Muslim world who are well-established in the cultures and communities they represent and wish to reform.

 if it is ok i would love to link to this.





Mazahery is an inspiration(none / 0) (#2)
by Mahsa on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 04:59:27 AM EST

wow.  Yet another fantastic speech by a truly fantastic woman.  I have read some of Dr. Mazahery's previous writings and speeches, and she never ceases to amaze me.  I am so glad that there are women like her who can champion the causes that most others just ignore.  These women are truly role models and deserve special recognition and thanks from all of us.

Thanks Eteraz for posting Dr. Mazahery's speech.





Brave and beautiful(none / 0) (#3)
by TallDave on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 01:27:55 PM EST

It's unfortunate that Iran's political system is controlled by people who have far more interest in acquiring nuclear weapons than in improving the human rights situation.

I have been told Iranian prostitutes are becoming increasingly common in Europe.  Apparently that life is still a big step up from the situation under the mullahs.





Will the real Eterazians please stand up?(none / 0) (#4)
by Nedal Hindi on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 04:44:19 PM EST
...and most certainly, less than Persian.

 But we are not Persian, and don't want to be. Should fornication be criminalised? Is that Persian?

Many of these judgements come about because the defendent is marginalised, poor, or has insufficient means to defend her/himself. Which explains why there happen to be more women than men who were sentenced. The article itself mentions how many of these judgements were wrong, and the defendent was in fact a victim. I am not aware of the Penal Code in Iran, but it probably would contain problematic clauses like that in Pakistan. The support for Mr. Ghamidi's position in Pakistan was based on arguments that were sound from within the state framework.

 Ms. Mazahery, on the other hand is campaigning for european style state, and the judicial system under the Shah. She is perfectly within her rights to do so. What I do not see however, is why one ought to support her rather than build networks with Islamic reformers, like Ghamidi, or Khatami? For people who view that the Shari'a in itself is evil, it is natural to argue for a repeal of this draconian and nonsensical system. For those who think that this is not Shari'ah, but a botched, failed attempt at fiqh which should be corrected, and suspended in the interim (a la Tariq Ramadan), we ought to say so. I just want to know, what is Eteraz? Is it the former (Kemalist secularist), or the latter (reformist), or is it a forum for both factions? Why not just lay it out?



Oh! You want depth....(none / 0) (#5)
by dmz on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 05:11:29 PM EST

What seems to go on here, for better or worse, is the tossing of hot-button issues, bluntly and crudely delivered like blog scuds that, I presume, are designed to spur conversation rather than inform or persuade.

Examples:

Khatami: Good | Ahmadinejad: Bad

Iran: Bad | Stoning: Bad

Ahmadinejad: Bad | Regime Change: Good

The details all have to be filled in by you and me. Thank God there are lots of intelligent readers who step past the pulp and seek the kernel. 



[ Parent ]


ah them methods again(none / 0) (#6)
by Ali Eteraz on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 05:28:38 PM EST

the future of 'reform' within the muslim states

is going to mirror precisely the 'problem' within the muslim states

muslim states today are neither exclusively secular, nor exclusively shariah based

iran itself has three simultaneous legal systems: swiss, french and islamic.

pakistan has swiss, british and islamic

ultimately, reforming a state's legal systems will not occur by way of offering a perfectly unified and whole ONE 'method'

but to play off all the methods for reform that exist out there

to be Eterazistani is to recognize that there is more nuance in reforming legal systems than just the words "secularist" or "islamic."

(even that dichotomy assumes that there is such a thing as that dichotomy)

i know it is really nice, psychologically and emotionally, to have just one method of fixing stuff, but that is not how stuff is fixed because when u want to solve problems you have to deal with a whole gamut of people

when i first contacted lily, i asked her why she didn't couch her arguments in the muslim reformist method

turns out she believes that the more appropriate approach in going after the abolition of stoning is to appeal to the idea of the persian heritage

let her

at the end of the day, i agree with her. this is called coalition building.

once we abolish stoning we can talk about who ought to get the credit, but most activists just want to take the credit up front "Oh yes, it is reformist Islam which is going to solve our problems" "Oh no, it is Turkic secularism which is going to solve the problem."

and the problem doesn't get solved -- all you do is give fools like DMZ more to cry about.



[ Parent ]
I have to clarify(none / 0) (#7)
by Samaha on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 06:19:19 PM EST

I'm a Blogsnian-Eterazistani-Ameri-Muslim.

Geez, I can't even say that - let alone have to explain it.



[ Parent ]


Nuance, aye, not naievete(none / 0) (#8)
by Nedal Hindi on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 06:21:45 PM EST

 ... to be Eterazistani is to recognize that there is more nuance in reforming legal systems than just the words "secularist" or "islamic."

I am not talking about just words, Ms. Mazahery and  Ahmedinejad are. The positions need to be defined, beyond labels - Islamist, secularist, or progressive. The secular problem with Iran is the classism/racism of the elites. The Islamic problem is a faulty understanding of the legal system. Muhammad Asad, Ghamidi, Asifa Quraishy, and many others have/are contributing intellectually to rectifying these problems. If one were voting for a particular law - yes, Ms. Mazahery would vote against it because it is un-Persian and un-American, and I would vote it against it because the clauses for evidence and judgements make it a greater evil.

  As a general movement however, I hope people here will not become fodder for the project for the beautiful Persian heritage -  Khusrau, Shah, Aryan pride, savak, zionist support, superiority over the jangli arabs, balochis, and the political exclusion of the bumpkins of Qom.



[ Parent ]
interesting(none / 0) (#10)
by Ali Eteraz on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 06:31:02 PM EST

in theory i dont disagree with what you're saying

but first of all, i dont really think that iranians are going to become gung-ho "Persianized" Khusravites just b/c a solid activist in the West ascribes to those beliefs. We need to focus on our agreements and not the trivial.

secondly, it is fascinating to me that the three names you drop -- asad, ghamidi and professor of law at univ of wisconsin(?) law school, are all sunnis and have nothing at all to do with iran.

so if you want to talk about nuance, can i ask you to at least start referencing some iranian names? at least some shi'a ones.

you see, that's where mazahery has you beat. she is iranian, even if she is all about cyrus instead of hadith.

so you see now my problem with getting into which 'method' to take to reform? it becomes an issue of "well, whom do we give spiritual authority to?"

and the victims just keep piling up.

no thanks.



[ Parent ]
Ahhh, but now you will(none / 0) (#11)
by Samaha on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 06:40:01 PM EST
need to explain your problem with AI's letter campaign.

[ Parent ]






clarifying(none / 0) (#9)
by Ali Eteraz on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 06:22:56 PM EST

oh yah, i knew i misspoke:

let her

at the end of the day, i agree with her. this is called coalition building.

this part should be: 'at the end of the day, i agree with her about aboliting stoning. [it doesn't matter that i would have preferred we got there by doing some down home fiqh]. this is called coalition building.

sorry was in rush first time.



[ Parent ]
Good(none / 0) (#12)
by Nedal Hindi on Thu Dec 21, 2006 at 07:16:49 PM EST

At least the need for method is acknowledged, and an alternative position was not shouted down. This is way more than what I have seen at Persian-American forums, where bigots like Ali Sina and refined royalty like the Shah's son pass as intellectuals. Coalition-building has to be honest, and if your reply has meant more honesty, I am very happy.

I linked to Dr. Quraishi's page because there are people who deserve attention. It would be wonderful if Iranian muslims bring their activities and ideas forth. Some of the students at Amir Kabir that protested against their president were members of a now suppressed reformist group. Who are they? What are their views/writings? Would some Iranian Eterazians shed some light?



[ Parent ]









Display: Sort: